Analysis of the Internationalization Pathways of Chinese Medical Device Enterprises-Taking Mindray Medical as an Example

Authors

  • Jieying Ye School of Foreign Languages, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/z8147135

Keywords:

Medical devices; internationalization path; Mindray medical; dynamic capability; global value chain.

Abstract

With the rapid development of China’s medical device industry and the continuous expansion of its export scale, corporate internationalization has become a focal point of attention for both academia and the industry. This paper uses Mindray Medical as a representative case study. By integrating the Uppsala internationalization model, the resource-based view, dynamic capability theory, and global value chain analysis, it explores how Chinese enterprises can enter institutional markets and achieve capability building. Research findings indicate that Mindray Medical has adopted a progressive path of “entering emerging markets-building compliance capabilities-achieving breakthroughs in high-end markets.” Through compliance adaptation, dynamic capability accumulation, and M&A integration, the company has transformed from a low-cost manufacturer into a global solutions provider. Mindray Medical has enhanced its regulatory compliance by adhering to EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) standards, while simultaneously upgrading its value chain from single-device manufacturing to ecosystem-based services. This pathway not only reveals the dual role of the institutional environment as both a constraint and a catalyst but also underscores the importance of localized services and strategic patent positioning. This paper provides case support for understanding the catch-up logic of emerging market enterprises and offers insights for the internationalization practices and policy formulation of Chinese medical device companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wang Y, Kumar R. Global Value Chain Upgrading in the Medical Device Sector: Lessons from China and India. Journal of World Business, 2023, 58(4): 101524.

[2] Zheng G, Zhu G, Mo K. Institutional Market Utilization, Dynamic Capabilities, and Technological Catch-Up: A Case Study of Mindray Medical. Management World, 2024, (7): 45-59.

[3] Zhao X, Chen Y. A Comparative Study on the Internationalization Paths of Chinese Medical Device Enterprises. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(6): 128-139.

[4] Huang Q. The Three Capabilities Model for the Successful Overseas Expansion of Chinese Medical Device Enterprises: A Study Based on Grounded Theory. Technology Economics, 2024, 43(5): 42-51.

[5] Chen L, Kim J, Müller T. Regulatory Pathways and Internationalization of Medical Devices: A Comparative Study of China, South Korea, and Europe. Health Policy, 2022, 126(9): 789-799.

[6] Zhou K Z, Prakash A. Institutional environments, resources, and organizational strategies: a comparative study of emerging market enterprises. China Economic Review, 2020, 63: 101460.

[7] Park J, Zhao Y. Global Competition and Innovation Catch-up in the Medical Device Industry: China, Korea, and India. Research Policy, 2022, 51(7): 104667.

[8] Das R, Huang X. Market Entry Strategies of Medical Device Firms in Emerging Economies: Evidence from China and India. Journal of International Management, 2023, 29(2): 100526.

[9] Lin Y, Park H. Cross-border M&A as a Path to Internationalization: Evidence from China's Medical Device Industry. Journal of World Business, 2022, 57(5): 101345.

[10] Li M, Park S, Gupta A. Emerging Market Multinationals in the Medical Device Industry: Comparative Paths of China, India, and South Korea. International Business Review, 2021, 30(6): 101948.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2025

How to Cite

Ye, J. (2025). Analysis of the Internationalization Pathways of Chinese Medical Device Enterprises-Taking Mindray Medical as an Example. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 16, 53-58. https://doi.org/10.62051/z8147135