Evolving Platform Responsibilities Under Regulation: A Comparative Study of Internal CSR Practices in Ride-hailing Platforms Across the EU, the US and China, and Implications for Sustainable Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/gmm99823Keywords:
Regulatory Models; CSR; Ride-hailing Platforms; Gig Economy.Abstract
This examination delves into the regulations from China, the EU, and the USA to understand what major ride-sharing companies like DiDi, Uber, and Lyft are doing internally, particularly in areas such as customer assistance and collaboration. Based on findings, it is evident that the EU's integrated rights-based framework can encourage standardized practices and compliance-oriented behavior, making corporate social responsibility (CSR) often an extension of legal requirements. The absence of U.S. federal legislation has led to fragmented regulations, prompting ride-hailing platforms to navigate state-level rules through political lobbying and state-specific benefit strategies. To strategically adapt, China employs categorized governance and incremental policies, aiming to help platforms strike a balance between accountability and flexibility, particularly in areas like algorithms and benefits. The study reveals how the regulatory structure shapes the strategic choices of CSR of online ride-hailing platforms through institutional pressure, expands the explanatory boundaries of CSR theory in the context of online ride-hailing platforms, and provides theoretical basis and practical inspiration for the sustainable governance of the most representative online ride-hailing industry in the gig economy.
Downloads
References
[1] Tan, X., Wu, X., & Zhong, X. Corporate Social Irresponsibility in Business: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Agenda. Management and Organization Review, 2024, 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2023.42
[2] Duan, W., Xue, X., Chen, Z., & Liu, L. How do institutional pressures influence corporate social responsibility? —A perspective based on state-owned enterprises. Information Technology and Management. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-025-00447-4
[3] Liu, W., Wang, C., Ding, L., & Wang, C. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Platform Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Extra-Role Behavior. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1895598
[4] Goel, A. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Role of Government. In Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application (pp. 141–161). Springer Singapore. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4076-3_10
[5] Zhang, Y. Defining Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) Practices: A Multidimensional Framework Of Compliance, Stakeholder Engagement, Strategic Value, And Cultural Sensitivity. State and Regions. Series: Economics and Business, 2024. 2 (132).
[6] Europa, Parliament, E., & Union, C. O. T. E. (2024, October 23). Directive (Eu) 2024/2831 Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Of The European Union. EUR-Lex. Retrieved 2025, August 24, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/2831/oj
[7] Sfetcu, L. Addressing The Challenges of Gig Work In The European Union: A Review of the Platform Work Directive. Scientific Annals of the "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University, Iaşi. New Series Sociology and Social Work Section, 2024, 17 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/asas-2024-2-769
[8] California Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) - Ballotpedia. Ballotpedia. Retrieved 2025, August 24, from https://ballotpedia.org/California_Assembly_Bill_5_(2019)
[9] Dubal, V. B. Economic security & the regulation of gig work in California: From AB5 to Proposition 22. European Labour Law Journal, 2021, 13 (1), 51-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211063111
[10] Davidov, G., & Alon-Shenker, P. The ABC Test: A New Model for Employment Status Determination? Industrial Law Journal, 2022, 51 (2), 235–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwac004
[11] California Proposition 22, App-Based Drivers as Contractors and Labor Policies Initiative (2020). Ballotpedia. Retrieved 2025, August 24, from https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition _22,_App-Based_Drivers_as_Contractors_and_Labor_Policies_Initiative_(2020)
[12] Official Website of the Chinese Government (2021, November 16). Regulations on the Administration of Algorithmic Recommendations for Internet Information Services. Retrieved. 2025,August,24,from https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-01/04/content_5666429.htm
[13] Ponce del Castillo, A., & Naranjo, D. Regulating Algorithmic Management: An Assessment Of The EC's Draft Directive On Improving Working Conditions In Platform Work. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4243530
[14] Gullifor, D. P., Petrenko, O. V., Chandler, J. A., Quade, M. J., & Rouba, Y. Employee reactions to perceived CSR: The influence of the ethical environment on OCB engagement and individual performance. Journal of Business Research, 2023. 161, 113835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113835
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








